By Wojtek Kolan - April 12, 2025
Form
L W W W W L L L L W
Form
L W L W L W W L L WDerived from the implied probability from the match winner, Tien has a 50% chance to get the victory.
TAKE NOTE: Join the Matchstat.com tennis picks club to compare implied vs actual predictions to get access to value bets so you can win big.
| Prediction | Chance To Win |
|---|---|
| Learner Tien | 50 % |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 56.25 % |
|
Above is implied from odds. Login now to discover our expert predictions. |
| Tien | Stats | Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (12-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (8-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 69 | Ranking | 88 |
| 66 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 19 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 7 |
| 74% (117-42) | Career Total W/L | 62% (361-224) |
| $431,935 | Career Prize Money | $3,420,360 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
13 Apr 2025 / Q3
Learner Tien implied favourite from odds → 50%
No H2H Matches Available
BMW Open - Munich
Clay| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Total Matches | 1 |
| 1:42:09 | Last Match | 1:09:42 |
| 1:42:09 | Total Time | 1:09:42 |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 3 | Aces Total | 3 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 54% (40/74) | 1st Serve % | 56% (25/45) |
| 75% (30/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 84% (21/25) |
| 50% (17/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 65% (13/20) |
| 75% (6/8) | Total Break Points Won % | 80% (4/5) |
| 43% (3/7) | Total Break Points Saved | 100% (1/1) |
| 69% (9/13) | Service Hold (%) | 100% (8/8) |
| 54% (7/13) | Opponent Hold % | 50% (4/8) |
| 45% (34/76) | Return Points Win % | 48% (22/46) |
| 54% (81/150) | Total Points Won | 62% (56/91) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreak Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00 | Tiebreaks Per Match | 0.00 |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hold onto your rackets, folks, because the battle of Tien versus Zandschulp is about to serve up a cocktail of tennis prowess peppered with statistics. If second serves were cocktails, Tien would be mixing up a 41.2% concoction of success in the last six months, while Zandschulp prefers a slightly stronger version with a splash of 43.33%. When it comes to returning the favor, Tien's been sipping on 48.13% of their opponents' second serves, leaving Zandschulp a little parched at 46.53%.
But wait, there's more! If first serve returns were fairground rides, both would be on the 27% rollercoaster, with Tien hanging on at 27.04% and Zandschulp bravely matching with a dizzying 27.4%. Predicting a winner has never been more fun! As we dive deeper into pressure cooker moments, Tien saves 54.26% of breakpoints with the coolness of a seasoned pro. Meanwhile, Zandschulp's saviour maneuvers clock in at 50.47%, ensuring neither lets their guard down easily.
Now, zooming out for a grand performance panorama, Tien has danced through the last year with an impressive 79.78% match win rate, while Zandschulp bats a respectable 52.24%. On the surface of surfaces, Tien loves roller skating on hard courts, flaunting a 76% win rate. Zandschulp, however, prefers the in-door hard scene, surfing at 63%. A love story, maybe? Not quite on clay and grass, where win rates get a little muddy.
Examining their opponent lineup, Tien has battled the underdogs of world rankings (270.96 on average), whereas Zandschulp has tangoed with players ranked 156. When things get tight, Tien's decisive set record shines at an 81% success rate, leaving Zandschulp with room for improvement at 43%. Additionally, Tien's got a knack for converting breakpoints at 35.19%, while Zandschulp tries to break out with 30.37%.
So, who takes the trophy home? With a stronger mix of solid stats and clay-covered boots, our stats predict Tien swings into the winner's circle, leaving us eagerly holding our breath for that winning moment!
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Learner Tien
Player
Henri Squire
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Learner Tien
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Learner Tien
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(1) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Learner Tien
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Alexander Zverev
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Cameron Norrie
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Dusan Lajovic
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
93)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Learner Tien
65%
(
77 of
119)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
109)
24
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
60 of
77)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
52 of
78)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Lukas Klein
51%
(
63 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
44%
(
27 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
63 of
127)
132
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Andrea Vavassori
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
67%
(
24 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Tien Vs Zandschulp is now available here.
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44% (4/5) | Win/Loss | 62% (168/102) |
| 45% (9/11) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (380/249) |
| 50% (91/92) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3109/2632) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 13 | Aces Total | 776 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 21 | Total Double Faults | 863 |
| 1:29:2 | Average Match Time | 1:22:50 |
| 484.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 425.92 |
| 65% (365/565) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9318/15268) |
| 64% (234/365) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (6394/9318) |
| 47% (94/200) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2862/5950) |
| 52% (30/58) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (836/1851) |
| 41% (227/560) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6950/15933) |
| 44% (4/9) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (163/258) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 33% (1/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (33/61) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (44/84) |
| 100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (162/146) |
| 0% (4/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (162/16) |
| 0% (5/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (107/23) |
See recent tennis photos of Tien and Zandschulp
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
View Draw
